Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Charles Holm's avatar

Hello Ari. I have so many thoughts...actually, mostly questions, but I'll try to be brief.

First, in Texas teaching Black Studies courses in 2021-2022 during my first (and so far only) year as an assistant professor in the field, I wish I had been better prepared to teach "controversial" subjects and hold space for more discussion and dialogue between students with opposing viewpoints, experiences, and expertise. Even the last three "uncontroversial" semesters teaching Composition I as an adjunct at a community college has been challenging in this regard. Either conversations do not happen, or students are uncomfortable with everything that might be construed as "political" (everything, but especially anything they find disagreeable or controversial). "We are here to learn how to write, not talk about politics," has generally appeared in some form or other in a few end of semester student feedback responses.

Though some things improved this semester, it wasn't because of anything brilliant I planned in advance or implemented with much foresight. I taught three small classes (18-26 students each) and often the silence was deafening, and in each course only 4-5 students regularly contributed to group discussions or felt comfortable sharing their writing or ideas with the class...

I like the "lessons" you describe in these posts, and am glad things "worked out" positively. I think I' need to and will incorporate explicit language about the importance of "getting to know each other," sitting through and embracing discomfort, and listening to each other into the syllabus,

Do you have any specific examples of the "readings and exercises" you ended up adding that might be of general use, or of the "community-building work" the class/students did?

Second, from your August post, this passage stood out to me: "I can’t imagine teaching a class on Israel/Palestine at this moment that wouldn’t feel incredibly difficult no matter how much we tried to just brush the differences and disagreements between students under the table. So we’re going to lean into them."

I've never been totally confident what people mean when they say "lean into" something (probably because I usually encounter it through social media liberal/"progressive" influencer discourse). What did it actually look like in your class? I tend to use the word "confront" as in we will "confront differences," which sounds harsh thinking about it. Regardless, as someone who took an iteration of your course 15 or 16 years ago, and knowing where students are today and the world as it is, negotiating whatever differences there are in your classroom, and building community without ignoring or downplaying them, must be a constant challenge...

And that brings me to my third and final comment in this otherwise overly wordy and all things considered possibly meaningless feedback: the class I took with you in 2009 was exceptional, as I recall it, in that the material and discussions and debates we had in class always seemed engaging, the material important, and contesting ideas and "controversy" welcome. I seem to recall a mock "peace process" day being especially interesting in hindsight. In relation to that class, and what has transpired since, I just have a few things to say:

1. Very much endorse the new extra credit options! I think the options back in the day had something to do with using Twitter (which I resisted using for another decade and just recently deleted) and filling out an NCAA basketball bracket (something I have yet to ever do and have no interest in).

2. I'd be interested in seeing the current syllabus, especially the reading list, if you wouldn't mind sharing. Also, is the class "Israel/Palestine" still or "Israel and the Middle East"? This may be meaningless or otherwise insignificant, but in August it was still the "Israel/Palestine" class and now you describe it as focused on "Israel, the Palestinians, and the politics of the Middle East," and the "“Israel and the Middle East” class, referencing as extra credit a "panel discussion with visitors from the Middle East." I guess if you send my the syllabus, that would answer the question.

3. How have your thoughts evolved or what boundaries do you draw between the classroom and community being built with students? I've been warned about building too much community, or "caring too much" for students (and this in a meeting sharing a complaint I received from a student not in my class about an anti-Jewish bigot and extremely unqualified Bible college trained "ethics" instructor, no less). As a student, and now as faculty, I've always considered community the main thing: learning happens together and is ongoing. Two of the students who took your course at the same time as me remain good friends, one a very close friend and a lawyer now, and that friendship in part grew through a commitment to human rights, international law, and our experiences as young activists learning about Israel/Palestine, both in the course and beyond it, in 2009....

There is always more to say, but I'll stop and hope this is mostly legible as I click send.

PS: I'm 100% a solid Luddite ideologically when it comes to AI. It. Must. Be. Stopped.

Expand full comment
Beth Dotan's avatar

Heartwarming to hear that students embraced the opportunity to have their voices honored in a course focused on such a challenging topic. The philosophies of teaching civil discourse resonate deeply with bell hooks "Teaching with Transgression" and the Polish educator, Janusz Korczak, both of whom put the student at the center, sometimes altering the course of the syllabus from time to time, but allowing students to learn their topic from a perspective the instructor had not anticipated. Thanks for sharing these student comments. There is hope in civil discourse! (Now to figuring out how to combat the other issues!)

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?