Semester's End
Right before the beginning of this semester, I made a series of changes to the syllabus of one of my classes after attending a seminar on teaching civil discourse. Since the class focused on Israel, the Palestinians, and the politics of the Middle East, it seemed a good contender for a class where we should be up front about how we study contentious topics. Here’s what I wrote at the time:
I’ve spent the past week making major changes to my course syllabus, bringing in new readings and exercises that will help to build a stronger community in the classroom so that we can have the kinds of difficult conversations that often remain below the surface.
I wasn’t sure what would happen—and, in particular whether the students would go for it—but a lot of people who heard about or read about what I was planning to do were very interested. I was asked a lot of questions about my class over the past few months and now I think I’m ready to do some reflecting on how it went.
The first thing to say is that it was a clear success. The time that we spent getting to know one another and the emphasis we placed on really listening to one another had an obvious impact, as did the number of extra credit opportunities that were available to students and that they chose to do. This wasn’t some sort of unique or special group of students—though they were, as a group, quite good—but they interacted with one another very differently from the students in my other class this semester, where I did not change the syllabus to add any civil discourse and community-building work. In my “Israel and the Middle East” class, students were always talking (loudly) with one another before class and a big group of them routinely went to lunch together after class. In the other class, which focused on contemporary political philosophy, I would regularly walk into the classroom to find the students sitting silently, in the dark, staring at their computers, tablets, or phones. I made clear to both classes that there were a number of opportunities for extra credit over the course of the semester—a conference on heroic behavior on campus, several visiting scholars on different topics, a panel discussion with visitors from the Middle East—but students from one class chose to regularly attend while students from the other class didn’t.
In short, the class in which I consciously devoted time to learning about one another and to how we would be deliberate in our talking and listening quickly developed the feel of a real community. The students cared about one another, wanted to spend more time together, and thus acted in ways that made those feelings clear. It was so obvious right from the beginning that I immediately began making plans to expand on this community-building work in my class next semester.
I should also note to final things:
First, the tone of the class didn’t play a role in the way that students did their work or the grades they received. I think it’s important to make note of this because the results of my little experiment could’ve been the result of a particularly exceptional group of students or I could have bribed them with an easier workload or a promise of good grades. In this class, the students were good—as I mentioned above—but they were very much the normal group of students that I’ve come to expect in my classroom each semester. Some of them are incredibly high-achieving and some of them are right in the middle and some of them are doing what they need to do in order to get the minimum grade for the course to count toward their major. The fact that they felt a deeper sense of camaraderie in the classroom didn’t mean they turned all of their assignments in on time or had a perfect attendance record. While many of them chose to attend the additional lectures outside of class, which were billed as extra credit opportunities in addition to community-building exercises, a significant chunk of them neglected to actually turn in the required one paragraph response in order to get the extra credit. In this class, as in my other class, many students didn’t do the assigned daily reading assignments and a few completely stopped attending—a problem that has been much more common post-pandemic—and suffered grade penalties as a result. And, just as always happens these days, students ran into serious academic integrity problems as a result of unauthorized usage of artificial intelligence tools. In other words, the changes I made to the syllabus improved the course in one obvious and measurable way, but didn’t seem to affect the way students engaged with the workload of the class.
Secondly, the students themselves recognized that they were a part of something different and they talked about it regularly amongst themselves and to me. I don’t have the course evaluations back yet—maybe later this week?—but I suspect it will be noted by a majority of them in the feedback that they wrote. Several students commented, in the last week of the class, about feeling sad that the class was ending and the five students who signed up to take my class next semester attempted to recruit their classmates to join them. The students were assigned weekly reading responses throughout the semester and a few of them commented on the course as part of their final responses. Here are just a handful of messages I received:
“I’ve thoroughly enjoyed this class these past few months; it’s been my favorite challenge, so thank you.”
“In all, this class has taught myself and my classmates how to have hard conversations and open ourselves to new ideas.”
“I wanted to start by saying that I have deeply enjoyed this class and feel like I am leaving knowing so much more than I thought I would in college classes. This was my favorite class of the semester, and I've loved having you as a professor! I feel like a lot of college courses are just blown through and never brought up again by students, but this one actually taught me something. It taught me quite a lot actually, and I want to thank you for that.”
“Your class has been my favorite I have taken at UNL thus far, and I just wanted to say thank you for the way you taught this class. Being able to have open and honest conversations with one another, even if we disagree with each other, is something that this class fostered…. I’ll miss this class so much!”
“I was so sad to have this be our final week of classes. There have been two other classes in my college career that have given off similar energy that this one does - my Intro to Religious Studies course I took my first semester of school and…Race, Ethnicity, and Politics class which only had 9 students. I was trying to analyze what aspects of these courses all spoke to me, and I think I came down to the fact that in these classes, students’ voices matter. These three courses were structured not to teach at the students, but to also learn from those who take the class.”
All in all, I learned a lot about result of this experiment and I’m excited to expand on it in my next class — a new one called “The Politics of Antisemitism” that I’ll be teaching for the first time starting in just a few weeks. I’m also quite curious what the reaction will be to this post, given the amount of attention I received from the first post about this class back in August, and I’m especially interested to see what sorts of questions people will leave for all of us to consider here in the comments!


Hello Ari. I have so many thoughts...actually, mostly questions, but I'll try to be brief.
First, in Texas teaching Black Studies courses in 2021-2022 during my first (and so far only) year as an assistant professor in the field, I wish I had been better prepared to teach "controversial" subjects and hold space for more discussion and dialogue between students with opposing viewpoints, experiences, and expertise. Even the last three "uncontroversial" semesters teaching Composition I as an adjunct at a community college has been challenging in this regard. Either conversations do not happen, or students are uncomfortable with everything that might be construed as "political" (everything, but especially anything they find disagreeable or controversial). "We are here to learn how to write, not talk about politics," has generally appeared in some form or other in a few end of semester student feedback responses.
Though some things improved this semester, it wasn't because of anything brilliant I planned in advance or implemented with much foresight. I taught three small classes (18-26 students each) and often the silence was deafening, and in each course only 4-5 students regularly contributed to group discussions or felt comfortable sharing their writing or ideas with the class...
I like the "lessons" you describe in these posts, and am glad things "worked out" positively. I think I' need to and will incorporate explicit language about the importance of "getting to know each other," sitting through and embracing discomfort, and listening to each other into the syllabus,
Do you have any specific examples of the "readings and exercises" you ended up adding that might be of general use, or of the "community-building work" the class/students did?
Second, from your August post, this passage stood out to me: "I can’t imagine teaching a class on Israel/Palestine at this moment that wouldn’t feel incredibly difficult no matter how much we tried to just brush the differences and disagreements between students under the table. So we’re going to lean into them."
I've never been totally confident what people mean when they say "lean into" something (probably because I usually encounter it through social media liberal/"progressive" influencer discourse). What did it actually look like in your class? I tend to use the word "confront" as in we will "confront differences," which sounds harsh thinking about it. Regardless, as someone who took an iteration of your course 15 or 16 years ago, and knowing where students are today and the world as it is, negotiating whatever differences there are in your classroom, and building community without ignoring or downplaying them, must be a constant challenge...
And that brings me to my third and final comment in this otherwise overly wordy and all things considered possibly meaningless feedback: the class I took with you in 2009 was exceptional, as I recall it, in that the material and discussions and debates we had in class always seemed engaging, the material important, and contesting ideas and "controversy" welcome. I seem to recall a mock "peace process" day being especially interesting in hindsight. In relation to that class, and what has transpired since, I just have a few things to say:
1. Very much endorse the new extra credit options! I think the options back in the day had something to do with using Twitter (which I resisted using for another decade and just recently deleted) and filling out an NCAA basketball bracket (something I have yet to ever do and have no interest in).
2. I'd be interested in seeing the current syllabus, especially the reading list, if you wouldn't mind sharing. Also, is the class "Israel/Palestine" still or "Israel and the Middle East"? This may be meaningless or otherwise insignificant, but in August it was still the "Israel/Palestine" class and now you describe it as focused on "Israel, the Palestinians, and the politics of the Middle East," and the "“Israel and the Middle East” class, referencing as extra credit a "panel discussion with visitors from the Middle East." I guess if you send my the syllabus, that would answer the question.
3. How have your thoughts evolved or what boundaries do you draw between the classroom and community being built with students? I've been warned about building too much community, or "caring too much" for students (and this in a meeting sharing a complaint I received from a student not in my class about an anti-Jewish bigot and extremely unqualified Bible college trained "ethics" instructor, no less). As a student, and now as faculty, I've always considered community the main thing: learning happens together and is ongoing. Two of the students who took your course at the same time as me remain good friends, one a very close friend and a lawyer now, and that friendship in part grew through a commitment to human rights, international law, and our experiences as young activists learning about Israel/Palestine, both in the course and beyond it, in 2009....
There is always more to say, but I'll stop and hope this is mostly legible as I click send.
PS: I'm 100% a solid Luddite ideologically when it comes to AI. It. Must. Be. Stopped.
Heartwarming to hear that students embraced the opportunity to have their voices honored in a course focused on such a challenging topic. The philosophies of teaching civil discourse resonate deeply with bell hooks "Teaching with Transgression" and the Polish educator, Janusz Korczak, both of whom put the student at the center, sometimes altering the course of the syllabus from time to time, but allowing students to learn their topic from a perspective the instructor had not anticipated. Thanks for sharing these student comments. There is hope in civil discourse! (Now to figuring out how to combat the other issues!)